百思不得姐
每天一款新车上市？将“速度内卷”转向“质量竞争”,每天一款新车上市？将“速度内卷”转向“质量竞争”_我的网站
A |
Screenshot from the video of Al Jazeera's interview with Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim
After Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim recently reaffirmed Taiwan is part of China during an interview, the Taiwan island's Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was clearly rattled.
Experts said this only underscores the one-China principle has long been an established international consensus, and that the more the "pro-independence" DPP peddles narratives of "international support for Taiwan" and stirs up trouble, the more developments will emerge that run counter to its "Taiwan independence" agenda.
In a statement issued on Tuesday, Taiwan's regional external affairs department called Anwar's recent remarks on Taiwan "false," claiming that Answer openly seeks to justify the mainland's use of force to unify Taiwan.
In a video interview with Al Jazeera, released on August 16, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said, "I see Taiwan as part of China, period. You may disagree with there are some excesses. Yes, express your view, but it must be in the context. It is one China. It is accepted by all."
In response to the question on that "China has said that if peaceful reunification doesn't work, they reserve the right to use force. If it comes to that, would you condemn them?" Anwar responded by drawing an analogy with Malaysia. He said that if any part of Malaysia sought to break away, it would be his responsibility to preserve the country's territorial integrity.
When the host asked, "So, you would use force?" Anwar answered, "Yes," adding that otherwise the country would risk becoming fragmented.
Anwar's remarks, including those on China's use of all means to resolve the Taiwan question, highlight the firm international consensus on the one-China principle and reaffirm the basic principles enshrined in the UN Charter and international law, Zheng Jian, a professor at the Graduate Institute for Taiwan Studies at Xiamen University, told the Global Times on Wednesday.
Zheng noted that the Taiwan question is China's internal affair. A sovereign state has the right to safeguard its territorial integrity. Condoning separatist acts in Taiwan region would also set a problematic precedent for other countries dealing with their own separatist issues.
In a statement on Tuesday, the Taiwan regional authorities claimed that Anwar's support for the Chinese mainland could negatively affect the confidence of Taiwan businesses investing in Malaysia.
The Taiwan regional authorities' "threat" of possible economic and trade losses for Malaysia carries limited weight and amounts largely to bluffing. Zheng noted that Taiwan island does not control any critical lifelines of Malaysia's economy, while Malaysia has alternative channels and partners. Such threats therefore amount to little more than verbal posturing.
The Taiwan regional authorities' fierce but useless overreaction stems from the heavy reliance of "Taiwan independence" forces on external support. Once international statements contradicting their narrative gain traction within Taiwan, their domestic propaganda - such as claims of "widespread international support" for Taiwan - risks unraveling, prompting their sharp backlash.
Also, aside from the Malaysian prime minister's recent remarks, the joint exercises recently held by China and Indonesia have also dealt a blow to the DPP authorities. As key countries along the "first island chain", their moves have opened a rift in the denial-and-deterrence defense system built by the US, Japan and Taiwan island, delivering a major strategic blow to "Taiwan independence" forces, said Zheng.
"The more the DPP provokes and hypes up issues, the more international developments unfavorable to 'Taiwan independence' will emerge. If the DPP continues down the doomed and erroneous path of 'independence,' there will be more occasions in the future when it finds itself rattled," Zheng said.
。 【忠阳车评】客观看待“速成车” 在德系、日系等国际车企纷纷表态要拥抱“中国速度”时，中国市场则对新车迭代速度过快现象开始反思。日前，有车企高管在某论坛上说，部分车企为追求上市速度，直接删减设计验证、量产验证等关键环节，让消费者变成试车员，引发“速成车”大讨论。 尽管已有不少业内专家辟谣，今年上半年国内超600款新车上市，混合计算了配置衍生等多种情况，实际并没那么多。然而，即便按照各口径统计后的保守情况看，仍有约165款新车，这一数字处于历史高位，“相当于每天有一款新车上市”。 中国车企上新速度之快，既有技术进步的原因，也有市场竞争压力使然。 从技术上看，一方面，平台化、模块化让成熟的驱动架构和“三电”系统可以跨车型高效复用，无需从零摸索；另一方面，仿真测试技术的成熟，让车企能在虚拟世界里完成数百万公里的极限工况验证，大幅压缩了纯物理测试的周期。 从市场上看，经过多年高速增长以后，我国车市已从增量市场进入存量调整阶段。在经营主体和品牌数量没有明显减少的情况下，激进的销售目标与存量调整现实强化了市场竞争强度。
B | 车企不得不以更快速度，在一款车还没跌出用户视野之前，就推出改款或换代，确保产品能够继续获得足够流量和销量。 问题是，当前业界关于“速成车”并没有一个科学准确的定义。判断一辆车是不是“速成”，不能简单以时间作为衡量标尺，关键在于它是否完整地走完了所有必需的验证流程。如果一款车在开发中违背规律、偷工减料、削减试验，即使周期再长，那也是不合格产品；如果一丝不苟地完成了法规和行业标准里的每一项测试，即使周期缩短，也不能轻易称之为“速成车”。 当然，这个开发周期也要有底线。完整车型开发分为大改型、中改型、小改型3类：动力底盘全新重构的大改型，标准开发周期为36个月；下车身改动的中改型，周期为24个月；仅调整内外饰、造型的小改型，最低合规周期为18个月。突破这一底线，产品风险就会增加。 同时，仿真测试也不能完全取代真实道路测试。汽车仿真测试是指通过计算机模拟车辆真实使用环境及配置状态，在交付前进行的系统性测试方法，是真实测试的预演和摸底。虽然两者不是简单的替代关系，甚至仿真测试能够模拟真实路测中较难出现的极端情况，但若过于依赖高频次实验室中的仿真测试，降低真实道路的频次，产品质量也会被打上问号。 汽车作为交通工具，使用场景复杂，产品质量不仅关乎驾乘人员生命安全，也关乎用户体验。汽车开发周期缩短正成为不可逆的产业趋势，如何规范汽车开发流程，在技术迭代提速与产品安全底线之间找到最优解，不仅需要车企加强自律，也需要监管协同发力。 值得关注的是，近期全国汽车标准化技术委员会已就3项新能源汽车定型试验规程公开征求意见，拟将新能源车型的可靠性行驶试验总里程提升至3万公里；工信部装备工业一司则赴多家车企开展道路机动车辆生产企业产品安全保障能力和生产一致性监督检查，推动汽车产业从“速度内卷”转向“质量竞争”。 在汽车质量安全管理领域，汽车工业发达国家早已形成成熟的体系。
C | 过去，国内主要是借鉴这些成熟的管理经验来做传统汽车的质量安全管理，特别是在开放合作过程中，通过学习和借鉴，我们逐渐形成了燃油车的质量安全管理体系。然而，在智能电动车领域，质量安全管理与传统汽车有很大不同，大家都还处于起步、摸索阶段。作为新能源赛道领跑者，我们更有优势、也更有信心做得更好，为全球汽车产业的转型升级贡献中国方案。(本文来源：经济日报 作者：杨忠阳)。
Current article:http://exgmyn.diuhuairandaikaomangshangnen.buzz/list_a1xj/zzr9vkn.html
Published on:13:44:26
